[177674] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Seastrom)
Fri Jan 30 12:45:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Paul Nash <paul@nashnetworks.ca>
From: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:45:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <252417D4-9A19-4734-B931-1A23015404CF@nashnetworks.ca> (Paul
Nash's message of "Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:06:59 -0500")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Paul Nash <paul@nashnetworks.ca> writes:
> Ruckus is also *way* easier to configure than Cisco. Some of the
> Cisco folk that I know think that that is a point in favour of
> Cisco, as it adds to job security :-)
That matches my experience with Cisco 802.11 kit. Way too many knobs
exposed, and guidance on how to set them is thin on the ground.
Sensible defaults and quick to configure on the Ruckus kit.
-r
