[177622] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Nash)
Thu Jan 29 05:17:41 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Paul Nash <paul@nashnetworks.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAHf3uWyq2c6z8pWvX-=82ZfOvSxLu9q3L0Ri6_=SyDFrJeP1kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:17:32 -0500
To: Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>
Cc: Untitled 3 <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Make that +2. I am halfway through an install for about 800 users =
spread through a multi-story building with around 100 R700 access points =
and ZD 3000. Once you understand the basics, it is trivial to set up, =
easy to manage, performance is superb.
Using RADIUS auth you can assign different groups of users to different =
VLANs (all on a single SSID), just different username/password to =
connect.
Signal penetration is the best that I have ever seen, and makes the =
Cisco Aironet enterprise stuff look really really silly.
paul
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:46 AM, Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br> =
wrote:
>=20
> +1 Ruckus+ZoneDirector
>=20
> --
> Eduardo
>=20
> Em quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2015, Tyler Mills =
<tylermills@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>=20
>> Have had a lot of experience with Ruckus(and Unifi unfortunately). =
The
>> Ruckus platform is one of the best. If you will be responsible for
>> supporting the deployment, it will save you a lot of frustration when
>> compared with UBNT.
>>=20
>> On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 12:18:54 AM Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Check out Xirrus
>>> On Jan 28, 2015 9:08 PM, "Manuel Mar=C3=ADn" <mmg@transtelco.net
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Dear nanog community
>>>>=20
>>>> I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with =
APs
>>> that
>>>> you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend =
recommended
>> me
>>>> Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience
>> with
>>>> Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for =
this
>>> type
>>>> of requirement was not that good.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thank you and have a great day
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Eduardo Schoedler
