[177621] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Knipe)
Thu Jan 29 04:52:49 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHf3uWyq2c6z8pWvX-=82ZfOvSxLu9q3L0Ri6_=SyDFrJeP1kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:50:45 +0200
From: Chris Knipe <savage@savage.za.org>
To: Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mikrotik's also a rather good choice for the Wireless AP side...
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>
wrote:
> +1 Ruckus+ZoneDirector
>
> --
> Eduardo
>
> Em quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2015, Tyler Mills <tylermills@gmail.com=
>
> escreveu:
>
> > Have had a lot of experience with Ruckus(and Unifi unfortunately). The
> > Ruckus platform is one of the best. If you will be responsible for
> > supporting the deployment, it will save you a lot of frustration when
> > compared with UBNT.
> >
> > On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 12:18:54 AM Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Check out Xirrus
> > > On Jan 28, 2015 9:08 PM, "Manuel Mar=C3=ADn" <mmg@transtelco.net
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear nanog community
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with
> APs
> > > that
> > > > you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend
> recommended
> > me
> > > > Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience
> > with
> > > > Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for
> this
> > > type
> > > > of requirement was not that good.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you and have a great day
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>
--=20
Regards,
Chris Knipe
