[176550] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Thu Dec 4 10:58:34 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3CC31BD8-B3B0-414B-859B-9B9829B13987@pch.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 07:55:29 -0800
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In my informal conversations, what I got was that lawyers read the
> agreement, said 'no, we wont sign it' and then dropped it. If specific
> legal feedback isn't making it back to ARIN, then we need to start
> providing it,
>
> All the specific legal feedback I=E2=80=99ve heard is that this is a liab=
ility
> nightmare, and that everyone wants ARIN to take on all the liability, but
> nobody wants to pay for it. Are you hearing something more useful than
> that?
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
This is the same legal feedback most lawyers will give you about settlement
free peering as well.
CB
