[176549] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Thu Dec 4 10:55:33 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <54807F5F.2080209@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 07:53:44 -0800
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly, that's what I'm trying to figure out as well. In my informal
> conversations, what I got was that lawyers read the agreement, said 'no, we
> wont sign it' and then dropped it. If specific legal feedback isn't making
> it back to ARIN, then we need to start providing it, otherwise, the
> agreement will stand.
>
>
>
> On 12/4/2014 10:04 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:57:05 -0500, Andrew Gallo said:
>>
>> In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
>>> number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying
>>> Agreement.
>>>
>> Do we have a handle on *why* organizations are having issues with the
>> agreement?
>>
>
>
They want a pony.
