[173593] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Boyd)
Tue Jul 29 12:42:43 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Chris Boyd <cboyd@gizmopartners.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407291722260.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:42:31 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them =
a list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block =
allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.
There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that =
practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my =
communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another =
user.
--Chris
