[172075] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Huston)
Fri May 23 07:04:00 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYS1Ks2pOpDz84uotvB8GteXGqC7nSL88EJxJatHJYzNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 21:03:40 +1000
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Goodwin <jgoodwin@studio442.com.au>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 23 May 2014, at 3:29 pm, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Julien Goodwin =
<nanog@studio442.com.au> wrote:
>> On 23/05/14 11:21, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>> You can't cater to everyones broken network. I can't reach 1.1.1.1 =
from here either, but sometimes when I travel I can, even with TTL=3D1. =
At some point folks have to fix what's broken.
>>=20
>> 1.1.1.1 is not private IP space.
>>=20
>> BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24
>> Paths: (2 available, best #1)
>> 15169
>> AS-path translation: { Google }
>> edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
>> Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal, best
>> Community: Europe Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
>> Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
>> 15169
>> AS-path translation: { Google }
>> edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
>> Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal
>> Community: Europe Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
>> Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
>>=20
>> (Yes ok, it doesn't respond to any packets last I checked)
>=20
> <cough>some times it does</cough>
> (some portion of the space does/service replies to a sample of =
packets...)
>=20
> Geoff should have more info on the progress of his experiment though.
Some time back I did try responding to TCP SYNs with SYN ACKs, to see =
where it went. But
it massively increased load and I gave up. So if 1.1.1.1 responds to =
you.... its NOT me!
Geoff
