[172070] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri May 23 01:29:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <537EDB78.2000207@studio442.com.au>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 01:29:18 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Julien Goodwin <jgoodwin@studio442.com.au>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au> wrote:
> On 23/05/14 11:21, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> You can't cater to everyones broken network. I can't reach 1.1.1.1 from here either, but sometimes when I travel I can, even with TTL=1. At some point folks have to fix what's broken.
>
> 1.1.1.1 is not private IP space.
>
> BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24
> Paths: (2 available, best #1)
> 15169
> AS-path translation: { Google }
> edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
> Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal, best
> Community: Europe Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
> Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
> 15169
> AS-path translation: { Google }
> edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
> Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal
> Community: Europe Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
> Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
>
> (Yes ok, it doesn't respond to any packets last I checked)
<cough>some times it does</cough>
(some portion of the space does/service replies to a sample of packets...)
Geoff should have more info on the progress of his experiment though.
>
> I just wish Cisco wouldn't document it as a great IP address to use for
> your captive portal
yea.. 'document' ... I think 'hardcode' (or perhaps default-config) is
more like it, right?
