[172084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Howard)
Fri May 23 14:55:29 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:55:18 -0400
From: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMDXq5PaHVM3N5XvVHwOv7vhCTBwKWiRFf7q3U_zeNhExmGF1A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 5/22/14 9:41 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>My job isn't to increase v6. It's to make sure we can serve traffic over
>protocols we are asked to. We are dual stacked which means our customers
>are.
I'm not going to tell you what your job is.
I'm curious, though, whether your customers specify the Internet Protocol,
and if so, whether they specify a version number? As we say in rfc6540,
you should be certain you know whether an implementation is inclusive or
exclusive of IPv6.
Lee
