[172064] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Thu May 22 21:46:15 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMDXq5PaHVM3N5XvVHwOv7vhCTBwKWiRFf7q3U_zeNhExmGF1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:46:06 -0400
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rubensk@gmail.com');>>
> wrote:
>
>> >
>> >
>> > Jared,
>> >
>> > Akamai has been v6 enabled for years. Customers have choices and know
>> best.
>> >
>> > Isn't your network still offering both as customer choices? :-)
>> >
>>
>> Making new customers dual-stack by default for the last two years would
>> have gone far in increasing IPv6, unless Akamai is only losing customers
>> to
>> other CDNs instead of getting new ones...
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>
> My job isn't to increase v6. It's to make sure we can serve traffic over
> protocols we are asked to. We are dual stacked which means our customers
> are.
>
>
>
And correcting typo. Apologies, slippery thumbs
Best,
-M<
