[172063] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Thu May 22 21:42:01 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k1HbSNXudGad12s_6E_2EHfBKLaC+WqZKYrqYC4p0SArA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:41:53 -0400
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jared,
> >
> > Akamai has been v6 enabled for years. Customers have choices and know
> best.
> >
> > Isn't your network still offering both as customer choices? :-)
> >
>
> Making new customers dual-stack by default for the last two years would
> have gone far in increasing IPv6, unless Akamai is only losing customers to
> other CDNs instead of getting new ones...
>
>
> Rubens
>
My job isn't to increase v6. It's to make sure we can serve traffic over
protocols we are asked to. We are dual stacked which means our customers
are.
I ho
Best,
-M<
