[171529] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sun May 4 17:41:23 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:40:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405032022470.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart2281684.FeEMRF6xNY
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:23:43 PM Mikael Abrahamsson=20
wrote:
> I know lots of people who run vpnv4 separately from ipv4
> and ipv6 (so they have 3 sessions). The ones I talked to
> intends to run vpnv6 separately as well.
Except that VPNv6, today, relies on MPLSv4. So it's not=20
"pure" yet.
Mark.
--nextPart2281684.FeEMRF6xNY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJTZrO6AAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GWmwQAIaNWV8qNRYet7alRsp0QPBX
+IGPQRqcGc6mHX1ZK/oM7lhIe7P3+PCO8RzVgzsmHbWj4xkc53CLx4GQP7XS6tO1
GMsEkVFlE7+NV/TxdmiRU3OikQ2rNyYgQidB8wthw29BCeKpkMN0SXiQGMuxsmOH
i/I1zc+xxyfmTOLGa3LjbItAhiuFIlgSqheH4QxD9ac4lU9ZTkd9jJpgjIUq2B4x
DGVgF6M91iD9twAD+Daw6XmBzfjZCyPvPXFiwjexRU+WHZ30gQqc/oBWf0Rs5Aoq
HT0TY7RwA4mw9uENy7/oIerYnrFaUrXRhoxVnTFjrnI3hncETKzWUu9pPeM8SCNv
qhtcu32r0TtE/r/0PFqNyYmk4eISTHXEx8Ve/99O3dEm2SEaU/3KPTDNIomVroTC
V4E4JLPNVU3v1CIOt6rpPHpj7Owo3ip8PjMuRU54eIvDbbWzph7MJUV4IyFYzVVf
FHHZ7K+3pkTyU1jgPrZHkNXkpqz6DMfFO24bkaxLUataxlcbj0TYLSACa2hKxqhe
KkgI+s+wY0ARHbgzfcwS5qsvZTCLL7fMFDjZ6SBTss/sINt57Jp8SXviqDgQMpAv
sLddyiGEKZ6Zb8GsX9OOSjjgoeK/7NJPIm5QaNwX/XhtLs2m7/iK9zEV8QgW61VB
10QXDafDZ/a0ioT9HK6D
=MoTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2281684.FeEMRF6xNY--
