[171063] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DMARC -> CERT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Thomas)
Thu Apr 17 11:49:08 2014
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:48:34 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <57392.1397748875@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 04/17/2014 08:34 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700, Private Sender said:
>
>> I'm sorry but is there a fundamental misunderstanding of dmarc going on
>> in this thread?
> Yes, apparently mostly on the part of Yahoo apologists...
>
>> There is no need to flame a company because they implemented a policy to
>> ensure QoS to their customers. Either push your mail through their
>> servers, or Just find somewhere else you can push your mailing lists
>> through.
> Is it me, or has every single Yahoo apologist in this thread insisted
> on this same misrepresentation of the situation?
>
I'm rather interested to hear from the dmarc folks, one author of whom both
works for y! and i've seen post to this list. I find this all rather
incomprehensible;
I wonder what Mark Delaney thinks about this.
Mike
