[171062] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DMARC -> CERT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Apr 17 11:35:45 2014
To: Private Sender <nobody@snovc.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700."
<534F5646.4050805@snovc.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:34:35 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1397748875_2021P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700, Private Sender said:
> I'm sorry but is there a fundamental misunderstanding of dmarc going on
> in this thread?
Yes, apparently mostly on the part of Yahoo apologists...
> There is no need to flame a company because they implemented a policy to
> ensure QoS to their customers. Either push your mail through their
> servers, or Just find somewhere else you can push your mailing lists
> through.
Is it me, or has every single Yahoo apologist in this thread insisted
on this same misrepresentation of the situation?
--==_Exmh_1397748875_2021P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=Jpel
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1397748875_2021P--
