[171066] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DMARC -> CERT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Thu Apr 17 11:59:09 2014
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:58:10 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <534FF7D2.4000108@mtcc.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 08:34 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700, Private Sender said:
>>
>>> I'm sorry but is there a fundamental misunderstanding of dmarc going on
>>> in this thread?
>> Yes, apparently mostly on the part of Yahoo apologists...
>>
>>> There is no need to flame a company because they implemented a
>>> policy to
>>> ensure QoS to their customers. Either push your mail through their
>>> servers, or Just find somewhere else you can push your mailing lists
>>> through.
>> Is it me, or has every single Yahoo apologist in this thread insisted
>> on this same misrepresentation of the situation?
>>
>
> I'm rather interested to hear from the dmarc folks, one author of whom
> both
> works for y! and i've seen post to this list. I find this all rather
> incomprehensible;
> I wonder what Mark Delaney thinks about this.
Of course, they shouldn't send it from a @yahoo.com email address.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
