[170712] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: BGPMON Alert Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Vitkovsk=FD_Adam?=)
Fri Apr 4 03:59:12 2014
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Vitkovsk=FD_Adam?= <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
To: "mark.tinka@seacom.mu" <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>, "nanog@nanog.org"
<nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 07:58:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <201404031404.44935.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> That Upstream B is simply "accepting everything"
> their customer is sending to them without applying proper filters, or che=
cking
> to confirm that what their customer needs to send them should come from
> them is absolutely and unacceptably shocking!
I wonder when (or if ever) we'll have such a discussion about data packets,=
i.e. finding that someone is not doing packet-filtering based on BGP updat=
es is absolutely and unacceptably shocking!=20
adam
