[170176] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Mon Mar 24 21:38:51 2014
In-Reply-To: <m2zjkfyxq5.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:47:46 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.
>
> where do i do that?
Nick Hilliard: "don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol
translation is any less
ugly than CGN."
Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where
folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can
be stateless."
>> The question stands: where are you planning to get the extra IPv4
>> addresses for the static 1:1 mapping?
>
> maybe look at the +P in A+P
Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day. Explain yourself or don't.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
