[170174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Mon Mar 24 21:35:30 2014
In-Reply-To: <m2d2hb1agj.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:27:53 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> And all those IPv4 addresses for the 1:1 translation required by the
>> stateless version are coming from where exactly?
>
> maybe you should read the documents
I did. They were abstruse beyond even the normal level for RFCs but I
made it through. You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative
to CGN. The question stands: where are you planning to get the extra
IPv4 addresses for the static 1:1 mapping?
-Bill
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
