[168752] in North American Network Operators' Group
BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Tue Feb 4 13:09:23 2014
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:09:02 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <72280728-A8B6-4382-9F29-32082EE88042@puck.nether.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2/4/2014 10:03 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Ask your vendors for these features. Ask them to fix the bugs. The
> ball rolls uphill here and it's in their lap. Blaming the carriers
> is wrongheaded and putting it where it doesn't belong in many
> cases. Happy to discuss offline.
I'd like to echo Jared's sentiment here -- collectively speaking,
service providers need to figure out a way to deal with this issue,
before some congresscritters start to try to introduce legislation
that will force you to to do it in a way that no one will like.
$.02,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlLxLL4ACgkQKJasdVTchbJ95AEAm5GcMZUKvy5WDjycH8f4C4Dq
7t1inFCPmGhbmo/456kBAKpUxaf/y7eXVnsxo9/IvULsGEbrf8zdapuAOSUdJrem
=v0jF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----