[168735] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Mon Feb 3 22:23:49 2014
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:23:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQhOHmh9RFY-O9-iFAStEhG039Qbk8VD_2zbnjcyKwgWg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cb B" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
> I completely agree. My sphere of influence is bcp38 compliant. And,
> networks that fail to support some form of bcp38 are nothing short of
> negligent.
>
> That said, i spend too much time taking defensive action against ipv4 amp
> udp attacks. And wishing others would deploy bcp38 does not solve today's
> ddos attacks.
Nope. But providing a bigger, better tuned hammer to apply to people's
heads may. So any contributions you can make to
http://www.bcp38.info
will be cheerfully accepted. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
