[16730] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T NOC?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Buxton)
Mon May 11 11:01:41 1998
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:41:14 +1000
From: Ben Buxton <bb@zip.com.au>
To: Brian Wilson <wilsonb@mindspring.net>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980511102549.008a3750@pop.mindspring.com>; from Brian Wilson on Mon, May 11, 1998 at 10:25:53AM -0400
>
> >I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.
>
> >Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try
> >elsewhere?
>
> "This" referring to 'noc@att.net' and not 'nanog@merit.edu'.
> I think it was plain from his message ("I need to contact them"
> instead of "I need to contact you", etc) that he understood
> that 'nanog@merit.edu' isn't the address for AT&Ts NOC.
I'd better cover my reputation here and pipe in that yep, I
_know_ what nanog is for..hell, I've been on it for a while..I
figured that rather than wait for however long incase noc@att.net
wasnt right, I'd ask here to make sure it wasnt some BOFH redirection
to /dev/null, esp as it was a pretty hair-on-fire situation...
And yes the situation's in hand regarding the bogus routes..and
at&t arent the cause...but the fact that some major NSPs arent
filtering 61/8 at /19 as they probably should be is another
question...
--
Ben Buxton___bb@zip.com.au_____ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L
Zip's Network Dude /____|___|_)________/______\______________________
Carbon: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually
Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288 Paper: 92475276 v the best :)
