[16721] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T NOC?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay R. Ashworth)
Sat May 9 16:56:20 1998
Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 16:43:20 -0400
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199805091609.CAA26406@null.zip.net.au>; from BOFH <bb@zip.com.au> on Sun, May 10, 1998 at 02:09:03AM +1000
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 02:09:03AM +1000, BOFH wrote:
> AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19
> is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this
> is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email
> to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.
>
> Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try
> elsewhere?
On Sat, May 09, 1998 at 09:25:00AM -0700, Randy Bush replied, sarcastically:
> This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few
> network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators
> who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC.
>
> One of AT&T's NOCs may be reached at +1 (314) 519-5708. I found this
> surprising information using whois.
Now, see, Randy? There you go again.
"noc@att.net ... Is _this_ the correct address".
You _knew_ what he meant.
Cheers,
-- jr 'quit it, ok?' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
