[16738] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T NOC?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (michaels@sun.aracnet.com)
Mon May 11 12:25:37 1998
From: michaels@sun.aracnet.com
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: <michaels@sun.aracnet.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: "Your message with ID" <199805091609.CAA26406@null.zip.net.au>
"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few
>network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators
>who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC.
<snip>
Give me a break. I think it's pretty obvious that he meant "is noc@att.net,
an address I've already tried to email, the correct address to reach the ATT
NOC?"
Were you just venting, or did you seriously misunderstand that?
Mike
---------------
"BOFH" <bb@zip.com.au> wrote
> AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19
> is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this
> is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email
> to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.
>
> Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try
> elsewhere?
>
> --
> Ben Buxton_____________________ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L
> Zip Guy bb@zip.com.au
> /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Voice: 9270-4777
> | . \_.--._* Virtually Dial-in: 9247-7288, 9247-9144
> Fax: 92475276 v the best :)
