[165602] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS Reliability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Beavis)
Thu Sep 12 16:14:48 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAPhg-wQDwJKeXS437bQon3mbVaDKW0YQitKTMNrB0_UheYzk2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:14:34 +0100
From: Beavis <pfunix@gmail.com>
To: Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I go with 99.999% given that you have a good number of DNS Servers
(anycasted).
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
> DNS reliability?
>
> 98%
> 99%
> 99.5%
> 99.9%
> 99.99%
> 99.999%
>
> Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
>
> Whats the consensus?
>
>
> --
> Phil Fagan
> Denver, CO
> 970-480-7618
>
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Disclaimer:
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
