[165603] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS Reliability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Fagan)
Thu Sep 12 16:26:02 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAMvhC_6dxXc6kfqjdbuaqdU_Z7RxV+YLP4sbpzafPUiwgHtZbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:25:25 -0600
To: Beavis <pfunix@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Beavis <pfunix@gmail.com> wrote:
> I go with 99.999% given that you have a good number of DNS Servers
> (anycasted).
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
>> DNS reliability?
>>
>> 98%
>> 99%
>> 99.5%
>> 99.9%
>> 99.99%
>> 99.999%
>>
>> Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
>>
>> Whats the consensus?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Phil Fagan
>> Denver, CO
>> 970-480-7618
>>
>
>
>
> --
> () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
>
> Disclaimer:
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
