[165601] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS Reliability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Tong)
Thu Sep 12 16:11:29 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAPhg-wQDwJKeXS437bQon3mbVaDKW0YQitKTMNrB0_UheYzk2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:11:08 -0600
From: Bryan Tong <contact@nullivex.com>
To: Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
To me anything below 99.99% is unacceptable.
100 failures out of 100,000 queries still seems like a lot especially if
its not network related.
So I would say 99.999% would be what I would look for.
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
> DNS reliability?
>
> 98%
> 99%
> 99.5%
> 99.9%
> 99.99%
> 99.999%
>
> Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
>
> Whats the consensus?
>
>
> --
> Phil Fagan
> Denver, CO
> 970-480-7618
>
--
--------------------
Bryan Tong
Nullivex LLC | eSited LLC
(507) 298-1624
