[164354] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Tue Jul 9 22:19:28 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Janet Sullivan <janets@nairial.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:18:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: <8efc4e2baff7443f8dfd052e560f4d98@BY2PR07MB043.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, I bel=
ieve. Could be a result of that?
Sent from my Mobile Device.
-------- Original message --------
From: Janet Sullivan <janets@nairial.net>
Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and so f=
ar haven't been able to make any traction with anyone on either side. I'm=
betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or Ashburn.
uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0) Tue Jul 9 20:39:53 2013
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields qu
it Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 212.111.33.230 0.0% 43 1.7 0.7 0.5 1.8 0.3
2. 212.111.33.237 0.0% 43 2.3 1.9 1.1 22.7 3.3
3. 63.218.13.221 0.0% 43 2.3 15.6 1.1 230.3 45.9
4. ???
5. 74.40.2.173 23.3% 43 177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9 7.0
6. 74.40.2.193 20.9% 43 149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2 2.1
7. 74.40.3.241 18.6% 43 149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2 8.8
8. 74.40.5.49 28.6% 43 148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1 9.9
9. 74.40.5.54 26.2% 43 148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7 12.6
10. 74.40.5.46 33.3% 42 149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8 14.0
11. 74.40.3.137 16.7% 42 147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0 4.1
12. 74.40.1.154 29.3% 42 148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7 14.2
13. 50.34.2.162 35.7% 42 150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3 1.2
14. 50.46.150.55 26.2% 42 150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0 0.4
