[164356] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Richmond)
Tue Jul 9 23:36:04 2013
From: Jeff Richmond <jeff.richmond@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xsixnekbs9rxe9fq6a83icr3.1373422726492@email.android.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:35:31 -0700
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our =
peering sessions with them, so looks like a problem on their network. =
I'll ask our NOC to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we =
can find out what the issue is.
Thanks,
-Jeff
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bailey =
<wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, =
I believe. Could be a result of that?
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
>=20
>=20
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Janet Sullivan <janets@nairial.net>
> Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
>=20
>=20
> I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and =
so far haven't been able to make any traction with anyone on either =
side. I'm betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or =
Ashburn.
>=20
> uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0) Tue Jul 9 20:39:53 2013
> Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields qu
> it Packets Pings
> Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1. 212.111.33.230 0.0% 43 1.7 0.7 0.5 1.8 0.3
> 2. 212.111.33.237 0.0% 43 2.3 1.9 1.1 22.7 3.3
> 3. 63.218.13.221 0.0% 43 2.3 15.6 1.1 230.3 45.9
> 4. ???
> 5. 74.40.2.173 23.3% 43 177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9 7.0
> 6. 74.40.2.193 20.9% 43 149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2 2.1
> 7. 74.40.3.241 18.6% 43 149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2 8.8
> 8. 74.40.5.49 28.6% 43 148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1 9.9
> 9. 74.40.5.54 26.2% 43 148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7 12.6
> 10. 74.40.5.46 33.3% 42 149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8 14.0
> 11. 74.40.3.137 16.7% 42 147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0 4.1
> 12. 74.40.1.154 29.3% 42 148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7 14.2
> 13. 50.34.2.162 35.7% 42 150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3 1.2
> 14. 50.46.150.55 26.2% 42 150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0 0.4
>=20
