[164353] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google's QUIC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darrel Lewis (darlewis))
Tue Jul 9 21:57:47 2013
From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
To: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:57:21 +0000
In-Reply-To: <op.wze4eygw4oyyg1@alvarezp-ws>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wr=
ote:
>>=20
>> Lisp is actually very much about multihoming... In fact that was one of =
the key reasons it got started. It actually could make >multihoming and mob=
ility very much simpler at the applications if it were used.
>=20
> Yeah, but LISP is as [in]accessible to end-users as BGP is and it will
> be like that forever. It requires ISPs to opt-in to provide this. LISP
> is not a universal option.
>=20
> LISP matters to the Internet core, it doesn't matter to the whole Interne=
t.
> It is just not universal.
LISP does not require your physical ISP to support LISP in order to receive=
service. It is available in open source as well as low end CPE routers, i=
n addition to larger, more expensive (and capable) routers sold by various =
vendors.
I don't know what you mean by universal, so I can't really respond to that.=
However, if you'd like a list of LISP service providers to provide you th=
e benefits of multi-homing in a non BGP environment, or to deliver IPv6 pac=
kets over an IPv4 intent connection, please contact me off line.
-Darrel=
