[162638] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Sat Apr 27 04:31:55 2013
To: Jima <nanog@jima.us>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:22:18 -0600."
<517B608A.9060101@jima.us>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:31:31 +1000
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <517B608A.9060101@jima.us>, Jima writes:
> On 2013-04-26 23:08, shawn wilson wrote:
> > There's ways around it for most software but old jetdirect stuff,
> > switches, routers, ip control systems. Things are going to be 6to4 for a
> > while. In fact I won't be surprised to see little hardware boxes that do
> > it for $30 or so (probably late with this idea but have no need to know).
>
> I hope you mean NAT64; 6to4 is, at best, iffy to support. I do like
> the $30 hardware device idea, though -- I haven't seen anything like
> that yet.
I saw adds for such a device a couple of years ago.
> The majority of what I think of when you say "control systems"
> shouldn't be directly connected to the internet anyway, even with ACLs
> -- or so I gleaned from the nice folks from DHS. ;-)
>
> Jima
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
