[162637] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jima)
Sat Apr 27 01:21:57 2013
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:22:18 -0600
From: Jima <nanog@jima.us>
To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_OBidQZEyb=BDUrfmP+A1p5iGvoXX7WMUQ9utxJAgRLqabeA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2013-04-26 23:08, shawn wilson wrote:
> There's ways around it for most software but old jetdirect stuff,
> switches, routers, ip control systems. Things are going to be 6to4 for a
> while. In fact I won't be surprised to see little hardware boxes that do
> it for $30 or so (probably late with this idea but have no need to know).
I hope you mean NAT64; 6to4 is, at best, iffy to support. I do like
the $30 hardware device idea, though -- I haven't seen anything like
that yet.
The majority of what I think of when you say "control systems"
shouldn't be directly connected to the internet anyway, even with ACLs
-- or so I gleaned from the nice folks from DHS. ;-)
Jima
