[162665] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Thomas)
Mon Apr 29 14:23:36 2013
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:22:30 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <517EB552.5070004@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 04/29/2013 11:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>
> If the existing cards handle CGN without additional licensing, then the only real cost is personal, my sanity, and the company need/will not factor that in.
One thing to consider is what the new support load will be from issues dealing
with CGN causing new breakage. That might be baked into your support already,
but at larger scale it probably isn't. Maybe it's marginal, but it's worth asking.
Mike
