[162235] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Apr 7 02:41:50 2013
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:40:09 -0400."
<CAL9jLaa63gKOxCKaqiJ6ebDEQEbNB7dr-P-z+kiA-Kctv8i-Yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:40:35 -0400
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1365316834_1839P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:40:09 -0400, Christopher Morrow said:
> I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support =
v6
> would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through tha=
t :(
The answer depends on whether the person making the decision thinks they'=
ll
have left the company before the IPv6 birds come home to roost. ;)
--==_Exmh_1365316834_1839P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=f8hp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1365316834_1839P--
