[162234] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Sun Apr 7 01:40:20 2013
In-Reply-To: <516102A9.2040301@studio442.com.au>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:40:09 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au>wrot=
e:
> >> ...CGN will not impact the access,
> >> reliability, speed, or security of Verizon=92s broadband services. ...
> ...
> > </blockquote>
>
> Good luck with that, pretty much by definition it has to do all four
> (albeit at levels that shouldn't be detectable to the end user)
>
I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support v6
would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through that :(
