[162236] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sun Apr 7 02:44:14 2013
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 08:42:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaa63gKOxCKaqiJ6ebDEQEbNB7dr-P-z+kiA-Kctv8i-Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support
> v6 would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through
> that :(
IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion.
Would you be less upset if there was IPv6 access and CPE based DS Lite (ie
your IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)?
CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth
is IPv6.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
