[162233] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Julien Goodwin)
Sun Apr 7 01:23:05 2013
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:22:49 +1000
From: Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPKkNb5QLynunmMkcLusMgDHGb9C1RhH0Hv+YWt+SigvWdowtA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 07/04/13 12:11, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 6 April 2013 18:24, cb.list6 <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Interesting.
>>
>> http://www22.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/highspeedinternet/networking/troubleshooting/portforwarding/123897.htm
>
> <blockquote>
...
>> ...CGN will not impact the access,
>> reliability, speed, or security of Verizon’s broadband services. ...
...
> </blockquote>
Good luck with that, pretty much by definition it has to do all four
(albeit at levels that shouldn't be detectable to the end user)
> I like how, according to the document, Verizon must first break your
> connectivity, prior to you being able to opt-out. :-)
If you look at it from their side this makes a lot of sense, helps to
ensure that only those who actually get breakage from the CGN opt out,
otherwise you'd never know to request it.
