[162232] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Sun Apr 7 00:37:22 2013
In-Reply-To: <5160D9F0.8010503@matthew.at>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 23:37:09 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/6/13, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
> On 4/6/2013 6:24 PM, cb.list6 wrote:
>
> I'd love to see a CGN box that is cheaper than IPv4 addresses currently
> are on the transfer market.
You mean like a few linux servers running iptables nat-masquerade?
You think the "Carrier Grade" in "Carrier Grade NAT" isn't just a
rhetorically constructed distraction, from the fact that simple NAT
may be implemented, and yeah, end users are certain to experience
annoyances, either way...
>
> Matthew Kaufman
--
-JH
