[161405] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Barak)
Tue Mar 12 13:33:07 2013
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>,
"kpospisek@bigpond.com" <kpospisek@bigpond.com>
In-Reply-To: <CED8AE82-E2B5-446C-9B68-5219275C1082@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
=0AFrom: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>=0A=0A>Dual stack is a (very) tempora=
ry solution while waiting for some others to catch=0A>up and deploy IPv6. C=
ontemplating dual-stack as a permanent or long-term=0A>solution ignores the=
extent to which IPv4 is utterly unsustainable at this point.=0A>Owen=0A=A0=
=0AOwen, when do you think IPv4 is going to go away to the point that it wi=
ll no longer be necessary to carry it?=A0 We may be using "long-term" to me=
an different things, so I'm curious to see what you mean by that.=0A=0A=0AD=
avid Barak=0ANeed Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: =0Ahttp://www.listentothef=
ranchise.com=0A=0A=0A________________________________
