[160723] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Mon Feb 11 20:04:59 2013
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:04:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <51199011.7050903@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Masataka Ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
> In addition, as PON is even less efficient initially when
> subscriber density is low and there are few subscribers to
> share a field splitter (unless extremely lengthy drop cables
> are used, which costs a lot), PON is slower to pay them off.
In case you missed it, I was the OP, and you don't have to convince *me*
not to use PON; I already didn't want to.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
