[160811] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Wed Feb 13 20:44:28 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Masataka Ohta
<mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:44:07 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20130214012354.C51042F91778@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Game. Blouses.
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Date: 02/13/2013 5:25 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
In message <511C3A4A.7050401@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta wri=
tes:
> Edward Dore wrote:
>
> > Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms
> > regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some
> > reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is
> > advertising BT/OpenReach's VDSL based Fibre To The Cabinet
> > and Virgin Media's Hybrid Fibre Coax networks as "fibre
> > optic broadband".
>
> Sadly, it is impossible to say FTTC not "fiber optic broadband",
> because it is "broadband" (at least with today's access speed)
> with "fiber optic".
And by that argument pots dialup is fiber optic because the packets
went over a fiber optic link to get to the CO.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
