[160715] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Mon Feb 11 19:18:02 2013
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:16:40 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMrdfRxL9db3w0aEWDr7FzfYUT39qEuHMaL-vzjUHgpbgsQFAA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Scott Helms wrote:
> IMO if you can't pay
> for the initial build quickly and run it efficiently then your chances of
> long term success are very low.
That is not a business model for infrastructure such as gas,
electricity, CATV, water and fiber network, all of which
need long term planning and investments.
Anyway, as SS is less expensive than PON, there is no reason to
insist on PON.
Masataka Ohta
