[157243] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Thu Oct 11 18:15:12 2012
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <298704693.331779.1349993169198.JavaMail.root@network1.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> You can route /48 or shorter (larger)
>
> How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is perfect, unless
> some of those sites require more than a /48. Then, it gets more
> complicated :-)
A /44 would give you 16 /48s. If you have 192 sites - assuming a /48 per
site - you would want at least a /40.
jms
