[157242] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Carpenter)
Thu Oct 11 18:08:46 2012

Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:08:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
To: surfer@mauigateway.com
In-Reply-To: <20121011150959.2F4CCF87@resin11.mta.everyone.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


> > ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> > A /48 is 65536 /64s and a /44 is 16x65536 /64s.  If you
> > only need one subnet (1 subnet = 1 /64), why would you
> > try to get 16x65536 subnets, rather than the 65536 you
> > have in the /48?
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> He said it was for multiple sites.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 
> DOH!
> Note to self: focus on the outage and don't respond to NANOG
> while troubleshooting.  ;-)
> 
> 
> scott

Sometimes a brief distraction can be therapeutic when under pressure ;-)

-Randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post