[157232] in North American Network Operators' Group
Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Thu Oct 11 17:02:54 2012
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:02:17 -0700
To: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I've finally convinced $DAYJOB to deploy IPv6. Justification for the IP =
space is easy, however the truth is that a /64 is more than we need in =
all locations. However the last I heard was that you can't effectively =
announce anything smaller than a /48. Is this still true?
Is this likely to change in the immediate future, or do I need to ask =
for a /44?
--=20
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet =
projects.
