[156126] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Fri Sep 7 02:31:37 2012

Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:30:24 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120906175913.GM7079@dyn.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> the DNS and won't discover anything about the DNS that can't be had
>> via getaddrinfo() until long after its too late redefine the protocol
>> in terms of seeking SRV records.
> 
> Oh, sure, I get that.  One of the problems I've had with the "end to
> end NAT" argument is exactly that I can't see how it's any more
> deployable than IPv6, for exactly this reason.

The easiest part of the deployment is to modify end systems.

> Because of the 20-year problem, I think now
> would be an excellent time to start thinking about how to make usable
> all those nice features we already have in the DNS.

Apple did it. See RFC6281.

						Masataka Ohta



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post