[156124] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Fri Sep 7 02:25:03 2012
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:23:30 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1398646.nogpiQX5tj@gentoovm>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Oliver wrote:
>> All that necessary is local changes on end systems of those who
>> want the end to end transparency.
>>
>> There is no changes on the Internet.
>
> You're basically redefining the term "end-to-end transparency" to suit your own
Already in RFC3102, which restrict port number ranges, it is
stated that:
This document examines the general framework of Realm Specific IP
(RSIP). RSIP is intended as a alternative to NAT in which the end-
to-end integrity of packets is maintained. We focus on
implementation issues, deployment scenarios, and interaction with
other layer-three protocols.
It's you who tries to change the meaning of "end to end transparency".
Masataka Ohta
