[156125] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Sep 7 02:30:42 2012
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:31:10 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <B2CB5F09-C842-4142-A586-A79992266269@corp.arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> If a relying party's use of PKI infrastructure legally equated to
> acceptance of the relying party agreement (RPA), then having an
> explicit record of acceptance of the RPA would not be necessary.
>
> Alas, it does not appear possible to equate use of PKI certificates
> with agreement to the associated RPA (and some might argue that this
> is a feature, as some folks would not want to be legally bound to an
> agreement which they did not explicitly review and accept.)
do you have a r&d group devoted to how much you can delay, damage, warp,
half-assed implement, ... rpki? look around you at the real world, the
other rirs (especiall ripe/ncc), etc. the only part of it where arin
seems to be doing a serious job is bs generation. thanks.
randy
