[151682] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
Wed Mar 28 14:48:06 2012
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:47:08 -0300
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Lynda <shrdlu@deaddrop.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F735B1B.4030909@deaddrop.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but, c'mon. For a provisioning
system, an AAAA record is just a fragging string, just like any other
DNS record. How difficult to support can it be ?
regards
Carlos
On 3/28/12 3:40 PM, Lynda wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 10:59 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> And they need to do anyway, if they want to keep the contract:
>>
>> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=8494
>
> This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to
> IPv6. I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to
> create glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to exist
> in IPv6, and it's a very limited list. I'm currently using Pairnic,
> and I am happy with them, mostly, but moving to IPv6 is painful.
>
> To quote:
>
>> We don't have a customer interface for IPv6 glue records on name
>> servers.
>> However, we can manually set them up if you can send us the information
>> for the records.
>
> That's probably okay for me, but it's really not conducive to any
> large scale operation. It needs to be run-of-the-mill, and not
> esoteric, to move it forward.
>
