[151681] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynda)
Wed Mar 28 14:40:53 2012
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:40:27 -0700
From: Lynda <shrdlu@deaddrop.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CB991DE6.6C622%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/28/2012 10:59 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> And they need to do anyway, if they want to keep the contract:
>
> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=8494
This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6.
I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to create
glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to exist in IPv6,
and it's a very limited list. I'm currently using Pairnic, and I am
happy with them, mostly, but moving to IPv6 is painful.
To quote:
> We don't have a customer interface for IPv6 glue records on name servers.
> However, we can manually set them up if you can send us the information
> for the records.
That's probably okay for me, but it's really not conducive to any large
scale operation. It needs to be run-of-the-mill, and not esoteric, to
move it forward.
--
It isn't just me.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jw_on_tech/archive/2012/03/13/why-i-left-google.aspx
