[151684] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Adams)
Wed Mar 28 14:51:58 2012
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:51:19 -0500
From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4F735B1B.4030909@deaddrop.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Once upon a time, Lynda <shrdlu@deaddrop.org> said:
> This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6.
> I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to create
> glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to exist in IPv6,
> and it's a very limited list. I'm currently using Pairnic, and I am
> happy with them, mostly, but moving to IPv6 is painful.
The same problem exists for DNSSEC; the number of registrars that
support both IPv6 glue and DNSSEC in their standard interfaces is
unfortunately small.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
